The New York Academy of Medicine

CASE
HOMEPAGE

2002 HRSA RWC CONFERENCE

CASE STUDY ABSTRACT, OBJECTIVES & DESIGN

CASE STUDY AMENDMENT: IMPACT OF 9/11 ON PWH/As TAKING HAART

CASE STAFF & GRANTEE ROSTER

DATA COLLECTION TOOLS

CASE STUDY DATA ANALYSIS PLAN

DISSEMINATION ACTIVITIES

RESOURCES & LINKS

  

CASE
The Center for Adherence Support Evaluation
at the New York Academy of Medicine


The Potential Role of Service Delivery and Program Factors on Adherence to Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy Outcomes: What Do Providers and Clients Have to Say?

Objectives.
HIV medication adherence support interventions are being increasingly implemented, but there is no uniform recipe to address the difficulties that people living with HIV/AIDS have in initiating and maintaining adherence to HIV medication regimens. Evaluations of adherence support intervention programs have concentrated on examining correlates of changes in adherence at the client-level. Little is known, however, about how service-delivery and program factors may influence clients' ability to adopt and maintain HIV medication adherence. As part of a national multi-site evaluation of different models of adherence support in 12 sites, we combined quantitative and qualitative methods to investigate service delivery factors that might influence program effectiveness for clients. In this presentation, we focus on: (1) clients' motivations to initiate or consider taking HAART, their facilitators and barriers to following HIV medication regimens, and their experiences with the adherence support program; (2) clients' and providers' perceptions of the program and its impact; and (3) organizational facilitators and barriers to provision of adherence support services.

Methods.
Multiple data collection methods were used to accomplish these evaluation objectives. Individual in-depth interviews were conducted with 100 health care providers delivering adherence support services and/or HIV medical care, and with 120 clients enrolled in adherence support interventions in each of the 12 sites over a four-month period (March-June 2001). A self-administered questionnaire, followed by a group interview with key program staff was also completed. Standardized guides with focused themes were used in both the individual and group interviews, followed by open-ended probes to elicit further information. All interviews were tape recorded and transcribed verbatim. Interviews were conducted by interviewers experienced in the conduct of qualitative interviews. Data are being analyzed with Nudist N'Vivo, a computerized software program, to identify common themes and patterns. Inter-rater reliability of the codes developed by three researchers was determined using the kappa coefficient.

Results.
Analyses will focus on describing the similarities and differences between clients and providers with respect to their perceptions of intervention successes and failures, and variations by type of program and type of target population. Differences in program structure and implementation style will be highlighted.

Conclusion.
Implications of program evaluation findings for clients, their adherence support providers and medical providers, and the service delivery system will be presented. The potential role of these factors in influencing successful client outcomes will also be discussed.


CASE
The New York Academy of Medicine
1216 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10029
(212) 822-7237

Last updated: 4/11/02