The New York Academy of Medicine

CASE
HOMEPAGE

2002 HRSA RWC CONFERENCE

CASE STUDY ABSTRACT, OBJECTIVES & DESIGN

CASE STUDY AMENDMENT: IMPACT OF 9/11 ON PWH/As TAKING HAART

CASE STAFF & GRANTEE ROSTER

DATA COLLECTION TOOLS

CASE STUDY DATA ANALYSIS PLAN

DISSEMINATION ACTIVITIES

RESOURCES & LINKS

  

CASE
The Center for Adherence Support Evaluation
at the New York Academy of Medicine


Taxonomy of HIV Medication Adherence Support Models: Experience from the SPNS Cross-Site Evaluation

Background: HRSA's Special Projects of National Significance (SPNS) sponsored 14 sites to evaluate local antiretroviral adherence support interventions (i.e. peer programs and readiness training) and the New York Academy of Medicine to conduct a cross-site evaluation of these interventions. Because these SPNS sites differ in fundamental ways, a challenge to the ongoing cross-site evaluation is to control for differences to identify effective program components.

Objectives: Describe current models of HIV medication adherence interventions. Develop a taxonomy allowing comparison of adherence to antiretroviral medications and service provision in different adherence programs.

Methods: A taxonomy of adherence support models with key program variables was developed based on data from site visits and qualitative interviews with clients and providers at each of the SPNS sites. These data were used to identify intervention elements that will serve as co-variates in the cross-site analyses of client-level outcomes.

Results: Commonalties were found in the types of services offered, while the populations served and style of service integration varied across sites. The data were used to develop comparative adherence support models that varied on multiple dimensions: population served, specific adherence services, intervention focus, guiding theoretical models, secondary intervention effects and features reported by providers and clients to be most effective in enhancing adherence.

Conclusions: Cross-site evaluation requires a detailed examination of program-level variables and their influence on client-level outcomes. Although each program is unique, commonalties among the sites create the opportunity to compare program components and to pool adherence data across sites to produce interpretable results.


CASE
The New York Academy of Medicine
1216 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10029
(212) 822-7237

Last updated: 4/11/02